On SD and MicroSD cards
Last updated on 2024-07-22.
I think SD cards are the best general-purpose data storage tech currently
being made. Why?
- Widely available and widely used.
- Reliable enough, especially when you buy "industrial" cards made with
SLC flash (one of many, many examples of older tech being better). These
are available from electronics suppliers like Digikey.
- Fast enough transfer speeds.
- Cheap. Even industrial-grade SD cards are cheap enough.
- Tiny, easy to store and conceal.
- Easy to destroy. You can put a MicroSD card in a paper shredder.
- Unlike USB devices, an SD card cannot do arbitrary things to your
computer. You do not have to trust the card; you need only trust your
card reader.
They have some downsides:
- MicroSD cards are too small, to the point that they are difficult to
handle, especially for people with certain disabilities. Standard size
SD cards are more than small enough.
- They are also too small to label. You can barely write a single word on
a full-size SD card. MicroSD, forget it. I label my MicroSD cards by
putting each one in a small plastic "pill bag" and putting a label on
the bag.
- They are not dumb enough. Each one contains a microcontroller -- that
is, a CPU. I have no idea what that little CPU is doing. But
at least it cannot take over or fry my computer when I plug
it in. (Don't use USB flash drives.)
- NAND flash is still less reliable than magnetic or optical media.
- SD cards have a write-protect switch, but it's lame, it just tells the
drive "please don't write to me", and the drive may ignore this.
Even with the downsides, I find SD cards to be the best option for my
storage needs. I use them for everything -- that is, when I am not using paper,
the king of data storage, which beats them all just because it can be accessed
without a computer. SD cards are the closest thing to being today's floppy
disk, and I mean that with great respect.
Other good (but not as good) storage media:
- Floppy disks, if only someone could make one that can handle the disgusting
bloat of today's software. (Bring back "Zip" disks?)
- Optical discs. Called "obsolete" today because they hold "only"
hundreds of megabytes. Sad.
- Tapes. Reliable high-capacity dumb storage that has been deemed
"enterprise" and therefore expensive. Also I don't really need to store
999 TB of data.
- Even audio cassette tapes would be good if they weren't so agonizingly
slow and low-capacity.
- CompactFlash. Too bad it has been relegated to being an overpriced
specialty medium now, basically only used in cameras. The tech is
better than that in SD cards.
Inferior storage:
- Hard disks. They can store a lot of data -- multiple TB nowadays. But
who really needs that much data? No one.
- SSDs. Basically bloated huge overcomplicated SD cards. I know they are
much faster than SD cards, I don't care, I don't have that much data,
and I typically keep all working data in RAM anyway.
- USB flash drives. Admittedly useful for "sneakernet" data transfers,
but, then, so are SD cards and card readers.
- The "cloud". Worst of all.
33mph.com